St Paul’s was built by Christopher Wren from 1675 - 1708 after the great fires in London. Northern Europe in 1600 - 1700s consisted of two predominate architectural styles: Baroque and Classic Palladian; both taking root in the revival of roman architecture. During this time there was a Great interest towards antiquity and looking back to Europe’s Roman roots. St Paul’s cathedral was built in the height of both these artistic movements and the question was what style should Wren use in re-building one of London’s greatest churches? The answer, a mixture of both Baroque and Classic Palladian. Through the eyes of Wren, this was a beautiful tribute to past Roman styles.
Even though over 320 years have passed,Wren built one of the most gorgeous churches I have ever seen. My visual experiences shape how I view the Cathedral and the churches I have attended have never had such splendor. The inside of this church is massive. Its overwhelming to take in all of its beauty at once. The ceiling is more beautiful than I could have ever imagined it, and to think people created that work with their hands is almost unbelievable. I remember thinking how proud God must of have been of his people when this church was built. We have technology, and even in this day and age we do not build anything nearly as gorgeous as they did in 1675. Being a strong believer in God, the experience made me tear up, how can there not be a God with buildings as beautiful as this one?
DISCLAIMER: I tried to write through a Bergerian Lens by looking at why Wren build what he did, but my experience of the mass was so emotional I couldn’t help but express how I saw it!
All research was gathered from Gardner's Art Through the Ages By Helen Gardner and my Art History 259 class notes
No comments:
Post a Comment